C_DBADM_2601 試験問題を無料オンラインアクセス

CHALLENGE 2 - Traceability Workload Monitoring Baseline
The database team can either tune memory-related settings now to improve late-shift traceability reporting or first preserve baseline monitoring evidence and tune only if the evidence supports it. Which option is most defensible?

• A.Preserve baseline monitoring evidence first, then approve tuning if current evidence supports it.
• B.Tune now and use the improved late-shift response time as the rollout readiness result.
• C.Reject all tuning until every plant has moved to SAP HANA Cloud reporting.
• D.Replace monitoring review with supervisor feedback because the reports are business-facing.

A regional print services company is rehearsing a phased migration from SAP HANA on-premises to SAP HANA Cloud. The export completes, the target database is reachable, and database explorer confirms that sample queries return dat a. During review, the administrator finds that the rehearsal workbook does not include a comparison of administration checks between the source system before export and the cloud target after import. The project lead wants approval because the query results are correct.
The constraint is that the migration wave must prove operational transition readiness, not only data access. The validation pattern must show that source administration evidence and target administration evidence were captured at the correct points in the migration sequence.
Which recommendation is most appropriate?

• A.Defer administration comparison until production cutover so the rehearsal can focus only on transfer completion.
• B.Capture source pre-export administration evidence and target post-import administration evidence, then approve only after both are validated.
• C.Approve the rehearsal because successful target queries prove that the migrated data is usable.
• D.Repeat the source export because missing administration comparison means the data movement failed.

CHALLENGE 1 - Cutover Configuration Evidence Traceability
The upgraded reporting system and the installed validation database both pass connection checks. The upgraded system's configuration value exists in monitoring notes, while the validation database value exists in the administration record. Which validation sequence is most appropriate?

• A.Accept connection checks, then update configuration records after cutover approval.
• B.Use the SAP HANA Cloud sample dataset as the comparison reference for both systems.
• C.Confirm active states, reconcile administration records, then accept comparison evidence.
• D.Apply the validation database value to the upgraded system before reviewing existing evidence.

A regional airport operator maintains SAP HANA for operational analytics while preparing an administration model that covers an on-premises database and an SAP HANA Cloud target. During a readiness review, SAP HANA cockpit confirms the on-premises database is available, while SAP HANA Cloud Central confirms that the cloud target is provisioned. However, the review evidence does not identify which environment owns backup monitoring, daily administration checks, or migration rehearsal validation.
The constraint is that the administrator must prevent unclear operational ownership before the next handover meeting. The team must keep both environments in scope without treating tool visibility as proof that administration responsibilities are correctly assigned.
Which action best addresses the ownership ambiguity?

• A.Use the on-premises database as the single administration reference until the migration project is fully completed.
• B.Remove the cloud target from the readiness review because it is not yet supporting the active workload.
• C.Assign each administration activity to the correct SAP HANA environment and validate the evidence source for each responsibility.
• D.Approve the handover because both environments are visible in their respective SAP administration tools.

CHALLENGE 1 - First Close Configuration Traceability
During first close rehearsal, claims analytics reports load successfully from the upgraded SAP HANA system. The final administration record does not show whether the post-upgrade configuration adjustment was active during the rehearsal. What should the administrator do before accepting the close reporting evidence?

• A.Apply the SAP HANA Cloud setting to the upgraded system to standardize the landscape.
• B.Reconcile the active configuration state with the final administration record before sign-off.
• C.Accept the evidence because successful report loading confirms close readiness.
• D.Remove the configuration adjustment from the review because reports loaded successfully.