ISO-IEC-27035-Lead-Incident-Manager 試験問題を無料オンラインアクセス

What can documenting recovery options and associated data loss/recovery timeframes assist with during incident response?

• A.Making informed decisions about containment and recovery
• B.Minimizing the impact on system performance
• C.Accelerating the incident response process

Which document provides guidelines for planning and preparing for incident response and for learning lessons from the incident response process?

• A.ISO/IEC 27037
• B.ISO/IEC 27035-1
• C.ISO/IEC 27035-2

Scenario 3: L&K Associates is a graphic design firm headquartered in Johannesburg, South Africa. It specializes in providing innovative and creative design solutions to clients across various industries. With offices in multiple parts of the country, they effectively serve clients, delivering design solutions that meet their unique needs and preferences.
In its commitment to maintaining information security, L&K Associates is implementing an information security incident management process guided by ISO/IEC 27035-1 and ISO/IEC 27035-2. Leona, the designated leader overseeing the implementation of the incident management process, customized the scope of incident management to align with the organization's unique requirements. This involved specifying the IT systems, services, and personnel involved in the incident management process while excluding potential incident sources beyond those directly related to IT systems and services.
Based on the scenario above, answer the following question:
Is the incident management scope correctly determined at L&K Associates?

• A.Yes, the incident management scope is customized to align with the organization's unique needs
• B.No, the incident management scope is overly restrictive, excluding potential incident sources beyond those directly related to IT systems and services
• C.No, the incident management scope is too broad, encompassing all IT systems regardless of relevance

Who is responsible for providing threat intelligence and supporting the lead investigator within an incident response team?

• A.Analysts and researchers
• B.IT support staff
• C.Team leader

Scenario 8: Moneda Vivo, headquartered in Kuala Lumpur. Malaysia, is a distinguished name in the banking sector. It is renowned for its innovative approach to digital banking and unwavering commitment to information security. Moneda Vivo stands out by offering various banking services designed to meet the needs of its clients. Central to its operations is an information security incident management process that adheres to the recommendations of ISO/IEC 27035-1 and 27035-2.
Recently. Moneda Vivo experienced a phishing attack aimed at its employees Despite the bank's swift identification and containment of the attack, the incident led to temporary service outages and data access issues, underscoring the need for improved resilience The response team compiled a detailed review of the attack, offering valuable insights into the techniques and entry points used and identifying areas for enhancing their preparedness.
Shortly after the attack, the bank strengthened its defense by implementing a continuous review process to ensure its incident management procedures and systems remain effective and appropriate While monitoring the incident management process, a trend became apparent. The mean time between similar incidents decreased after a few occurrences; however, Moneda Vivo strategically ignored the trend and continued with regular operations This decision was rooted in a deep confidence in its existing security measures and incident management protocols, which had proven effective in quick detection and resolution of issues Moneda Vivo's commitment to transparency and continual improvement is exemplified by its utilization of a comprehensive dashboard. This tool provides real time insights into the progress of its information security incident management, helping control operational activities and ensure that processes stay within the targets of productivity, quality, and efficiency. However, securing its digital banking platform proved challenging.
Following a recent upgrade, which included a user interface change to its digital banking platform and a software update, Moneda Vivo recognized the need to immediately review its incident management process for accuracy and completeness. The top management postponed the review due to financial and time constraints.
Based on scenario 8, Moneda Vivo has recently upgraded its digital banking platform. In line with the continual improvement process, Moneda Vivo has decided to review the information security incident management process for accuracy immediately after the software update. Is this recommended?

• A.No, the incident management process should be reviewed when the bank's annual audit is conducted
• B.Yes, the incident management process should be reviewed after any minor software update
• C.No, the incident management process should be evaluated after a significant technological overhaul to ensure the system is up-to-date