MCIA-Level-1-Maintenance 試験問題を無料オンラインアクセス

An organization has defined a common object model in Java to mediate the communication between different Mule applications in a consistent way. A Mule application is being built to use this common object model to process responses from a SOAP API and a REST API and then write the processed results to an order management system.
The developers want Anypoint Studio to utilize these common objects to assist in creating mappings for various transformation steps in the Mule application.
What is the most idiomatic (used for its intended purpose) and performant way to utilize these common objects to map between the inbound and outbound systems in the Mule application?

• A.Use the WSS module
• B.Use JAXB (XML) and Jackson (JSON) data bindings
• C.Use the Transform Message component
• D.Use the Java module

An organization's security requirements mandate centralized control at all times over authentication and authorization of external applications when invoking web APIs managed on Anypoint Platform.
What Anypoint Platform feature is most idiomatic (used for its intended purpose), straightforward, and maintainable to use to meet this requirement?

• A.Identity management configured in access management
• B.Enterprise Security module coded in Mule applications
• C.External access configured in API Manager
• D.Client management configured in access management

Organization wants to achieve high availability goal for Mule applications in customer hosted runtime plane.
Due to the complexity involved, data cannot be shared among of different instances of same Mule application.
What option best suits to this requirement considering high availability is very much critical to the organization?

• A.Use persistent object store
• B.High availability can be achieved only in CloudHub
• C.The cluster can be configured
• D.Use third party product to implement load balancer

An insurance company is implementing a MuleSoft API to get inventory details from the two vendors. Due to network issues, the invocations to vendor applications are getting timed-out intermittently. But the transactions are successful upon reprocessing What is the most performant way of implementing this requirement?

• A.Implement a Choice scope to invoke the two vendor applications on two different route Use the try-catch scope to implement the retry mechanism for timeout errors on each route
• B.Implement a scatter-gather scope to invoke the two vendor
  applications on two different route
  Use the Until-Successful scope to implement the retry mechanism
  for timeout errors on each route
• C.Implement a For-Each scope to invoke the two vendor applications
  Use until successful scope to implement the retry mechanism for the timeout errors
• D.Implement Round-Robin scope to invoke the two vendor applications on two different routes Use the Try-Catch scope to implement retry mechanism for timeout errors on each route

A company is designing a mule application to consume batch data from a partner's ftps server The data files have been compressed and then digitally signed using PGP.
What inputs are required for the application to securely consumed these files?

• A.The PGP public key of the partner
  The PGP private key for the company The FTP username and password
• B.ATLS context Key Store requiring the private key and certificate for the company PGP public key of partner PGP private key for the company
• C.TLS context trust or containing a public certificate for the ftps server The FTP username and password The PGP public key of the partner
• D.ATLS context first store containing a public certificate for partner ftps server and the PGP public key of the partner TLS contact Key Store containing the FTP credentials