JN0-694 試験問題を無料オンラインアクセス

Referring to the exhibit, an administrator notices that the VLAN interface is not coming up. What would cause this problem? Click the Exhibit to see a larger version.

• A.All member interfaces are down.
• B.The subnet mask is incorrect.
• C.All member interfaces are in access mode
• D.The unit number for the VLAN is misconfigured.

-- Exhibit --
policy-statement test_route_filter {
term 1 {
from {
route-filter 192.168.0.0/16 longer;
route-filter 192.168.1.0/24 longer {
metric 5;
accept;
}
route-filter 192.168.0.0/8 orlonger accept;
}
then {
metric 10;
accept;
}
}
term 2 {
then {
metric 20;
accept;
}
}
}
-- Exhibit -
Click the Exhibit button.
Given test route 192.168.1.0/24 and the configuration shown in the exhibit, what is the expected result?

• A.accepted with metric of 10
• B.rejected
• C.accepted with metric of 5
• D.accepted with metric of 20

Referring to the exhibit, an administrator has configured dot1q-tunneling on the VLAN, but LLDP is not being tunneled.

What is causing the problem?

• A.LLDP can only be processed one hop away.
• B.LLDP needs to be disabled on the tunneling device.
• C.LLDP needs to be enabled as a protocol to tunnel.
• D.LLDP tunneling only works on trunked interfaces.

-- Exhibit -

-- Exhibit -
Click the Exhibit button.
The exhibit shows a small switched network, some details about the MSTP configuration in the network, and the VLANs that are trunked over each link. When Switch2 reboots, users in VLAN 400 on Switch3 report that they lose connectivity to resources in VLAN 400 on Switch4.
What is the cause of this problem?

• A.VLAN 400 is not trunked between Switch1 and Switch3.
• B.There is a mismatched MSTP configuration name.
• C.VLAN 400 is trunked between Switch3 and Switch4.
• D.There are mismatched bridge priorities.

-- Exhibit -user@R1> show class-of-service interface ge-0/0/0 Physical interface: ge-0/0/0, Index: 134 Queues supporteD. 8, Queues in use: 4 Scheduler map: , Index: 2 Congestion-notification: Disabled
Logical interface: ge-0/0/0.0, Index: 69 Object Name Type Index Classifier ipprec-compatibility ip 13 -- Exhibit -
Click the Exhibit button.
You are sending traffic to the ge-0/0/0 interface on R1 with the expedited forwarding (101) IP precedence bits. However, the counters on the router show that it is not processing any traffic in the expedited forwarding queue.
Referring to the exhibit, what is causing the problem?

• A.The classifier is dropping the traffic.
• B.The classifier is assigning the traffic to the best-effort forwarding class.
• C.The classifier does not contain a mapping for this precedence value.
• D.The classifier is assigning the traffic a high loss priority.