(あなたの会社では、Google Cloud を含むマルチクラウド戦略を採用しています。すべての環境のアプリケーション ログをサードパーティの SaaS(Software as a Service)ツールに一元管理したいと考えています。Cloud Logging から生成されたログを統合する必要があり、エクスポートが可能な限り遅延なく行われるようにしたいと考えています。どうすればよいでしょうか。)
正解: B
Comprehensive and Detailed In Depth Explanation: The requirement is to export logs from Cloud Logging to a third-party SaaS tool with the least amount of delay possible. Let's analyze each option: A: Cloud Scheduler, Cloud Function, and querying Cloud Logging: This approach introduces a delay based on the Cloud Scheduler's cron job frequency. The Cloud Function would periodically query Cloud Logging, which might not capture the logs in real-time. This does not meet the "least amount of delay possible" requirement. B: Cloud Logging sink to Pub/Sub, SaaS tool subscribing to Pub/Sub: Cloud Logging sinks can be configured to export logs in near real-time as they are ingested into Cloud Logging. Pub/Sub is a messaging service designed for asynchronous and near real-time message delivery. By configuring the sink to send logs to a Pub /Sub topic, and having the SaaS tool subscribe to this topic, logs can be delivered to the SaaS tool with minimal delay. This aligns with the requirement for immediate export. C: Cloud Logging sink to Cloud Storage, SaaS tool reading Cloud Storage: Exporting logs to Cloud Storage involves a batch-oriented approach. Logs are typically written to files periodically. The SaaS tool would then need to poll or be configured to read these files, introducing a significant delay compared to a streaming approach. D: Cloud Logging sink to BigQuery, SaaS tool querying BigQuery: Similar to Cloud Storage, exporting to BigQuery is more suitable for analytical purposes. The SaaS tool would need to periodically query BigQuery, which introduces latency and is not the most efficient way to achieve near real-time log delivery. Therefore, configuring a Cloud Logging sink to Pub/Sub and having the SaaS tool subscribe to the Pub/Sub topic provides the lowest latency for exporting logs. Google Cloud Documentation References: Cloud Logging Sinks Overview: https://cloud.google.com/logging/docs/export/configure_export_v2 - This document explains how to create and manage Cloud Logging sinks, including the available destinations. Pub/Sub Overview: https://cloud.google.com/pubsub/docs/overview - This highlights Pub/Sub's capabilities for real-time message delivery and its use cases in streaming data. Exporting Logs with Cloud Logging: https://cloud.google.com/logging/docs/export - This provides a comprehensive guide to exporting logs from Cloud Logging to various destinations, emphasizing Pub/Sub for streaming.
Associate-Cloud-Engineer-JPN 試験問題 12
Cloud DNS を構成しています。home.mydomain.com、mydomain.com を指す DNS レコードを作成したいとします。www.mydomain.com を Google Cloud ロードバランサの IP アドレスに追加します。あなたは何をするべきか?
https://medium.com/google-cloud/how-to-deploy-cassandra-and-connect-on-google-cloud-platform-with-a- few-clicks-11ee3d7001d1 https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/databases/open-source-cassandra-now-managed-on-google-cloud https://cloud.google.com/marketplace You can deploy Cassandra as a Service, called Astra, on the Google Cloud Marketplace. Not only do you get a unified bill for all GCP services, your Developers can now create Cassandra clusters on Google Cloud in minutes and build applications with Cassandra as a database as a service without the operational overhead of managing Cassandra
Storage Admin (roles/storage.admin) Grants full control of buckets and objects. When applied to an individual bucket, control applies only to the specified bucket and objects within the bucket. firebase.projects.get resourcemanager.projects.get resourcemanager.projects.list storage.buckets.* storage.objects.* https://cloud.google.com/storage/docs/access-control/iam-roles This role grants full control of buckets and objects. When applied to an individual bucket, control applies only to the specified bucket and objects within the bucket. Ref: https://cloud.google.com/iam/docs/understanding-roles#storage-roles
auto-provisioning = Attaches and deletes node pools to cluster based on the requirements. Hence creating a GPU node pool, and auto-scaling would be better https://cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine/docs/how-to /node-auto-provisioning